What term describes judges voting together as a group?

The term that describes judges voting together as a group is "bloc voting." In this context, when judges form a bloc, it signifies that they share similar views or legal interpretations regarding a case and decide to cast their votes in unison. This collective decision-making can significantly influence the outcome of cases, as the strength of a bloc can sway the overall result, especially in tight votes where the opinions of individual judges may vary.

The other terms provided have distinct meanings: "swing vote" refers to a vote that can go either way, potentially determining the outcome in cases where the votes are otherwise evenly split. "Majority rule" indicates that the decision of the greater number of votes will prevail in a group decision, rather than implying collaboration among judges. "Unanimous decision" occurs when all judges agree on a particular verdict, which also does not necessarily reflect the coordinated voting that characterizes bloc voting. Each of these terms highlights different facets of judicial decision-making that do not capture the same sense of collective action found in bloc voting.